And that "deadly weapon" was? ... A bowl of spaghetti! Can you imagine that?
SDRoads (That's me!) and "man", whom, at this time, shall be referred to as "
Dlooking4u", by his choice, are trying to find the humor in this latest tragedy. I have been given the rights of the story. I shall share the complete version of this story at another time. The non-humorous part? ...
Dlooking4u could land in jail for 12 years. All he needs is for one key witness to tell the truth about the incident. I mentioned one way he could
prove himself innocent, by showing the angles of the results of that assault, in order to show that it wasn't assault, as it was more, self defense. He's a pretty sharp character. He had already thought that through. What I can't figure is this: How can it be considered "assault" in the first place? It would have to be, should be, termed as "battery". I mean, the "victim", or should I write, alleged victim (?), did get his head cracked open! So, how is that "assault"? Don't get me wrong. I am on the side of
Dlooking4u. I know this man, and am pretty dam##d sure that he would never have decided to "come up behind" (allegedly) some guy, any guy, and hit the m-f-er with a
frickin bowl of spaghetti!!! Excuse my language, y'all. I am just a bit heated up over this deal. More to come. -SD
